DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Cougar vs 2000 Audi A4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Cougar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeAudi
CougarModelA4
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
210 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
126 HPPower125 HP
177 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4479 mm
1770 mmWidth1733 mm
1320 mmHeight1417 mm
1300 KgWeight1390 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2607 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Cougar and 2000 Audi A4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…