DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mercury Cougar vs 1996 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
CougarModelExplorer
1996Model year1996
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors3/5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
220 HPPower155 HP
292 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank72 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4429 mm
—Width1783 mm
—Height1714 mm
—Weight1671 Kg
—Wheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mercury Cougar and 1996 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…