DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mercury Cougar vs 1995 Ford Windstar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
CougarModelWindstar
1995Model year1995
—Body typeMinivan
—Seats7
—Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
220 HPPower155 HP
292 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank95 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size205/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length5162 mm
—Width1915 mm
—Height1789 mm
—Weight1693 Kg
—Wheelbase2693 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mercury Cougar and 1995 Ford Windstar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…