1989 • Mercury
Cougar
Mercury Cougar 1989Overall Score67.5/100
1989 Mercury Cougar vs 1987 Buick Regal Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 3.8 V6 (182 Hp) 1987Overall Score66.75/100
WINNER
Mercury Cougar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury CougarSpecificationBuick Regal
MercuryMakeBuick
CougarModelRegal
1989Model year1987
—Body typeCoupe
—Seats5
—Doors2
Performance
Mercury CougarSpecificationBuick Regal
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
220 HPPower182 HP
292 NmTorque393 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury CougarSpecificationBuick Regal
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury CougarSpecificationBuick Regal
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears4 Hydramatic
—Tyre size205/70 R14
Dimensions
Mercury CougarSpecificationBuick Regal
—Length5095 mm
—Width1819 mm
—Height1374 mm
—Weight1530 Kg
—Wheelbase2746 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1989 Mercury Cougar and 1987 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSPontiac Bonneville vs Mercury Cougar1989 and 1989 model yearsImage unavailableVSMorgan Plus Eight vs Mercury Cougar1990 and 1989 model years
VSFord Aerostar vs Mercury Cougar1989 and 1989 model yearsVSBuick Regal vs Mercury Cougar1987 and 1989 model years
VSJeep Grand Cherokee vs Mercury Cougar1991 and 1989 model yearsComments are loading…