DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 AC Cobra vs 1994 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Cobra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ACMakeLand Rover
CobraModelRange Rover
1992Model year1994
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,2 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
215 km/hTop speed196 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4553 cc
228 HPPower224 HP
407 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank100 lt
17 ltUrban consumption22,9 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption16,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size255/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4155 mmLength4713 mm
1745 mmWidth1853 mm
1230 mmHeight1817 mm
1155 KgWeight2220 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 AC Cobra and 1994 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…