DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2005 Cadillac Escalade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac Escalade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeCadillac
MLModelEscalade
2002Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
232 km/hTop speed177 km/h
5439 ccEngine displacement5328 cc
347 HPPower299 HP
510 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
93 ltFuel tank98 lt
19,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
14,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
285/50 R18WTyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength5052 mm
1833 mmWidth2004 mm
1820 mmHeight1885 mm
2085 KgWeight2519 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2005 Cadillac Escalade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac Escalade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…