DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2000 Toyota Century Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Century

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.75–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeToyota
MLModelCentury
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h—
232 km/hTop speed210 km/h
5439 ccEngine displacement4999 cc
347 HPPower280 HP
510 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders12

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
93 ltFuel tank95 lt
19,7 ltUrban consumption20 lt
11,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
14,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
285/50 R18WTyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength5270 mm
1833 mmWidth1890 mm
1820 mmHeight1480 mm
2085 KgWeight1990 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2000 Toyota Century approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Century leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…