DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2000 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeJaguar
MLModelXJ
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
210 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4266 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
272 HPPower284 HP
390 NmTorque375 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank81 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
11,9 ltAverage consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
275/55 R17 HTyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4587 mmLength5023 mm
1833 mmWidth1799 mm
1802 mmHeight1345 mm
2015 KgWeight1780 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2000 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…