DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2000 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeVolkswagen
MLModelPassat
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
177 km/hTop speed218 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2324 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
220 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank62 lt
17,8 ltUrban consumption14,6 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/75 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4587 mmLength4670 mm
1833 mmWidth1740 mm
1802 mmHeight1460 mm
1855 KgWeight1430 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2000 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…