DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2000 Toyota Cavalier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Cavalier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeToyota
MLModelCavalier
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2392 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
220 NmTorque217 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank58 lt
17,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/75 R16Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4587 mmLength4595 mm
1833 mmWidth1735 mm
1802 mmHeight1395 mm
1855 KgWeight1300 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2645 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2000 Toyota Cavalier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Cavalier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…