DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi vs 2000 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeFord
E SerisiModelContour
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1982 cc
136 HPPower125 HP
190 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABS—

Dimensions

4816 mmLength4671 mm
1799 mmWidth1755 mm
1438 mmHeight1384 mm
1540 KgWeight1257 Kg
2833 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi and 2000 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…