DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs 2009 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeBuick
CLKModelRegal
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
231 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
183 HPPower223 HP
250 NmTorque349 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4652 mmLength4831 mm
1740 mmWidth1857 mm
1413 mmHeight1483 mm
1675 KgWeight1665 Kg
—Wheelbase2738 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK and 2009 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…