DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs 2005 Mazda RX-8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda RX-8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeMazda
CLKModelRX-8
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1308 cc
163 HPPower215 HP
240 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank61 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/55R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4427 mm
1740 mmWidth1770 mm
1413 mmHeight1340 mm
1665 KgWeight1395 Kg
—Wheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK and 2005 Mazda RX-8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda RX-8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…