DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs 2004 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercedes-Benz CLK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeAudi
CLKModelA3
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
225 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
163 HPPower140 HP
240 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4203 mm
1740 mmWidth1765 mm
1413 mmHeight1421 mm
1665 KgWeight1375 Kg
—Wheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK and 2004 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercedes-Benz CLK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…