DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs 2003 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeVolvo
CLKModelS40
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
218 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
163 HPPower200 HP
230 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4567 mmLength4516 mm
1722 mmWidth1716 mm
1380 mmHeight1422 mm
1615 KgWeight1310 Kg
—Wheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK and 2003 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…