DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs 2003 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercedes-Benz CLK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeJaguar
CLKModelX-type
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
218 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower130 HP
230 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4567 mmLength4672 mm
1722 mmWidth1789 mm
1380 mmHeight1430 mm
1615 KgWeight1500 Kg
—Wheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK and 2003 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercedes-Benz CLK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…