DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs 2000 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeRenault
CLKModelMegane
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
204 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
190 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4567 mmLength4082 mm
1722 mmWidth1698 mm
1380 mmHeight1368 mm
1575 KgWeight1200 Kg
—Wheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK and 2000 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…