DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC vs 2009 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeRenault
CLCModelMegane
2009Model year2009
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
220 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
143 HPPower160 HP
220 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16VTyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4452 mmLength4295 mm
1728 mmWidth1808 mm
1405 mmHeight1471 mm
1475 KgWeight1384 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2641 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC and 2009 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…