DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Alfa Romeo 145 vs 1996 MG MGF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMG
145ModelMGF
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
129 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/55 R15; 205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4093 mmLength3920 mm
1712 mmWidth1630 mm
1427 mmHeight1260 mm
1265 KgWeight1060 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Alfa Romeo 145 and 1996 MG MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…