DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1987 Mercedes-Benz 250 vs 1987 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercedes-Benz 250

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeMazda
250Model626
1987Model year1987
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

16,50 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
175 km/hTop speed176 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
159 NmTorque150 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4120 mm
1730 mmWidth2056 mm
1446 mmHeight1450 mm
1390 KgWeight—
2800 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1987 Mercedes-Benz 250 and 1987 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercedes-Benz 250 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…