DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Xedos 9 vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Xedos 9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
Xedos 9ModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
220 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
167 HPPower177 HP
218 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/65 R15 VTyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4825 mmLength4433 mm
1770 mmWidth1809 mm
1395 mmHeight1709 mm
1415 KgWeight1550 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Xedos 9 and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Xedos 9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…