DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Xedos 6 vs 1996 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Xedos 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
Xedos 6ModelMondeo
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
184 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
107 HPPower90 HP
138 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4556 mm
1700 mmWidth1751 mm
1355 mmHeight1427 mm
1140 KgWeight1371 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Xedos 6 and 1996 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Xedos 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…