DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Tribute vs 2003 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeBuick
TributeModelRegal
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2980 cc
203 HPPower172 HP
265 NmTorque256 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank64 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/70 R16 105 STyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4940 mm
1825 mmWidth1845 mm
1765 mmHeight1440 mm
1590 KgWeight1550 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Tribute and 2003 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…