2010 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 2.5i (171 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
2010 Mazda Tribute vs 2010 Volvo S80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.4 D (175 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo S80
MazdaMakeVolvo
TributeModelS80
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
171 HPPower175 HP
232 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo S80
4442 mmLength4851 mm
—Width1861 mm
1783 mmHeight1493 mm
1484 KgWeight1647 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda Tribute and 2010 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…