2010 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 2.5i (171 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
2010 Mazda Tribute vs 2010 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda TributeSpecificationFord Ranger
MazdaMakeFord
TributeModelRanger
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda TributeSpecificationFord Ranger
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
171 HPPower143 HP
232 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda TributeSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda TributeSpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda TributeSpecificationFord Ranger
4442 mmLength5075 mm
—Width1805 mm
1783 mmHeight1745 mm
1484 KgWeight—
2619 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda Tribute and 2010 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…