2011 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 2.3i (133 Hp) 2011Overall Score54.25/100
2011 Mazda Tribute vs 2011 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max Grand 2.0 Duratorq TDCi (140 Hp) 2011Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda TributeSpecificationFord C-Max
MazdaMakeFord
TributeModelC-Max
2011Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typeMPV
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda TributeSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h10,1 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
133 HPPower140 HP
263 NmTorque320 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda TributeSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda TributeSpecificationFord C-Max
4557 mmLength4520 mm
1806 mmWidth1828 mm
1784 mmHeight1684 mm
—Weight1575 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Mazda Tribute and 2011 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…