DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda Tribute vs 2007 Great Wall SUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeGreat Wall
TributeModelSUV
2007Model year2007
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h—
171 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
150 HPPower105 HP
200 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,4 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/70 R16 99 STyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4860 mm
1800 mmWidth1725 mm
1710 mmHeight1820 mm
1455 KgWeight1760 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda Tribute and 2007 Great Wall SUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…