DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda Tribute vs 2006 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
TributeModelC-Max
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
171 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower145 HP
200 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption10 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16 99 STyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4330 mm
1800 mmWidth1820 mm
1710 mmHeight1600 mm
1455 KgWeight1294 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda Tribute and 2006 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…