DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Tribute vs 2005 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDaewoo
TributeModelRezzo
2004Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
166 km/hTop speed111 km/h
1989 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
124 HPPower121 HP
175 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption12 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16 99 STyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4350 mm
1800 mmWidth1750 mm
1710 mmHeight1580 mm
1495 KgWeight1392 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Tribute and 2005 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…