DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Tribute vs 2000 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSeat
TributeModelAlhambra
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
169 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1989 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
124 HPPower110 HP
175 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16 99 STyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4617 mm
1800 mmWidth1810 mm
1710 mmHeight1728 mm
1425 KgWeight1754 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Tribute and 2000 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…