DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Tribute vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHonda
TributeModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
169 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1989 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
124 HPPower131 HP
175 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/70 R16 99 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4395 mmLength3950 mm
1800 mmWidth1695 mm
1710 mmHeight1750 mm
1425 KgWeight1330 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Tribute and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…