1999 • Mazda
Sentia
Mazda Sentia 3.0 i V6 18V (160 Hp) 1999Overall Score70.5/100
1999 Mazda Sentia vs 2000 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Pathfinder
Nissan Pathfinder 3.2 TD 4WD (150 Hp) 2000Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Pathfinder
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda SentiaSpecificationNissan Pathfinder
MazdaMakeNissan
SentiaModelPathfinder
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda SentiaSpecificationNissan Pathfinder
200 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement3153 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
250 NmTorque334 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda SentiaSpecificationNissan Pathfinder
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
16 ltUrban consumption15 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda SentiaSpecificationNissan Pathfinder
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda SentiaSpecificationNissan Pathfinder
4895 mmLength4530 mm
1795 mmWidth1840 mm
1420 mmHeight1750 mm
1530 KgWeight1900 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mazda Sentia and 2000 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…