DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Sentia vs 1996 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Sentia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi A6
MazdaMakeAudi
SentiaModelA6
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi A6
—0–100 km/h9,1 s
200 km/hTop speed219 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
160 HPPower174 HP
250 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
16 ltUrban consumption13,0 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi A6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi A6
4895 mmLength4797 mm
1795 mmWidth1783 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
1530 KgWeight1445 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Sentia and 1996 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…