DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Sentia vs 1996 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Sentia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi 80
MazdaMakeAudi
SentiaModel80
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed218 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
160 HPPower174 HP
250 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
16 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi 80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda SentiaSpecificationAudi 80
4895 mmLength4482 mm
1795 mmWidth1695 mm
1420 mmHeight1408 mm
1530 KgWeight1370 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Sentia and 1996 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…