1996 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Mazda Scrum vs 2000 Suzuki Alto Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Suzuki
Alto
Suzuki Alto 0.7 i 12V (46 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Suzuki Alto
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSuzuki Alto
MazdaMakeSuzuki
ScrumModelAlto
1996Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSuzuki Alto
125 km/hTop speed0 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement658 cc
42 HPPower46 HP
57 NmTorque57 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSuzuki Alto
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank30 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSuzuki Alto
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/80 R12 STyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSuzuki Alto
3295 mmLength3395 mm
1395 mmWidth1475 mm
1870 mmHeight1450 mm
780 KgWeight683 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Scrum and 2000 Suzuki Alto approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Alto leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…