DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda RX-8 vs 1999 Audi A4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda RX-8SpecificationAudi A4
MazdaMakeAudi
RX-8ModelA4
2003Model year1999
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda RX-8SpecificationAudi A4
6,5 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
240 km/hTop speed228 km/h
1308 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
240 HPPower180 HP
216 NmTorque235 Nm
2Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda RX-8SpecificationAudi A4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda RX-8SpecificationAudi A4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
245/45 R18Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda RX-8SpecificationAudi A4
4435 mmLength4479 mm
1770 mmWidth1733 mm
1340 mmHeight1417 mm
1330 KgWeight1305 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2622 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda RX-8 and 1999 Audi A4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…