1994 • Mazda
RX-7
Mazda RX-7 RX 1994Overall Score71.25/100
1994 Mazda RX-7 vs 1995 Caterham 21 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Caterham
21
Caterham 21 1.8 i 16V (190 Hp) 1995Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Mazda RX-7
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda RX-7SpecificationCaterham 21
MazdaMakeCaterham
RX-7Model21
1994Model year1995
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Mazda RX-7SpecificationCaterham 21
5,3 s0–100 km/h5,0 s
250 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1308 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
239 HPPower190 HP
294 NmTorque203 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda RX-7SpecificationCaterham 21
PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda RX-7SpecificationCaterham 21
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size205/45 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda RX-7SpecificationCaterham 21
4285 mmLength3800 mm
1760 mmWidth1580 mm
1230 mmHeight1150 mm
1280 KgWeight650 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Mazda RX-7 and 1995 Caterham 21 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda RX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…