2006 • Mazda
Roadster
Mazda Roadster 2.0 i (167 Hp) 2006Overall Score65.5/100
2006 Mazda Roadster vs 2006 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 CRDi (140 Hp) 2006Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Mazda Roadster
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationKia Optima
MazdaMakeKia
RoadsterModelOptima
2006Model year2006
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationKia Optima
—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
167 HPPower140 HP
190 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationKia Optima
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/50 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationKia Optima
3995 mmLength4735 mm
1720 mmWidth1805 mm
1245 mmHeight1480 mm
—Weight1525 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Mazda Roadster and 2006 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…