2000 • Mazda
Roadster
Mazda Roadster 1.8 i (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Mazda Roadster vs 2000 Toyota Opa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Opa
Toyota Opa 1.8 i 16V (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Opa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationToyota Opa
MazdaMakeToyota
RoadsterModelOpa
2000Model year2000
RoadsterBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationToyota Opa
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1839 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
160 HPPower136 HP
170 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationToyota Opa
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationToyota Opa
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationToyota Opa
3955 mmLength4250 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1235 mmHeight1530 mm
1010 KgWeight1210 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Roadster and 2000 Toyota Opa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Opa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSHonda Orthia vs Mazda Roadster2000 and 2000 model years
VSSubaru Forester vs Mazda Roadster2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSRenault Samsung SM5 vs Mazda Roadster2000 and 2000 model yearsVSToyota Opa vs Mazda Roadster2000 and 2000 model years
VSToyota Vista vs Mazda Roadster2000 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…