DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Revue vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
RevueModel323
1996Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
164 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
73 HPPower73 HP
108 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60 SR14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4200 mm
1655 mmWidth1705 mm
1470 mmHeight1410 mm
790 KgWeight1070 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Revue and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…