DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Protege vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Protege

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolvo
ProtegeModelV50
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
135 HPPower136 HP
157 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4522 mm
1695 mmWidth1845 mm
1420 mmHeight1457 mm
—Weight1472 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Protege and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…