DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Protege vs 1996 Rover MGF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRover
ProtegeModelMGF
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4175 mmLength3913 mm
1665 mmWidth1628 mm
1480 mmHeight1464 mm
1010 KgWeight1060 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Protege and 1996 Rover MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…