DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda Protege vs 1994 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
ProtegeModelClio
1994Model year1994
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
125 HPPower110 HP
0 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank43 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4175 mmLength3709 mm
1665 mmWidth1616 mm
1480 mmHeight1395 mm
1010 KgWeight955 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda Protege and 1994 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…