1997 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.6 i (115Hp) 1997Overall Score55.5/100
1997 Mazda Protege vs 1997 Caterham 21 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Caterham
21
Caterham 21 1.6 i 16V (117 Hp) 1997Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Caterham 21
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCaterham 21
MazdaMakeCaterham
ProtegeModel21
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCaterham 21
—0–100 km/h6,4 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
115 HPPower117 HP
135 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCaterham 21
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCaterham 21
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size205/45 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCaterham 21
4335 mmLength3800 mm
1695 mmWidth1580 mm
1420 mmHeight1150 mm
—Weight650 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Mazda Protege and 1997 Caterham 21 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…