1997 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.6 i (115Hp) 1997Overall Score55.5/100
1997 Mazda Protege vs 1997 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.8 GT (182.AC) 1997Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Bravo
MazdaMakeFiat
ProtegeModelBravo
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Bravo
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
115 HPPower113 HP
135 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/55 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Bravo
4335 mmLength4025 mm
1695 mmWidth1755 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
—Weight1100 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Mazda Protege and 1997 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…