1996 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.5 i (97 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Mazda Protege vs 1996 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1996Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Croma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Croma
MazdaMakeFiat
ProtegeModelCroma
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Croma
—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1489 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
97 HPPower94 HP
132 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Croma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFiat Croma
4335 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
—Weight1240 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Protege and 1996 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…