DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Protege vs 1996 Caterham 21 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCaterham
ProtegeModel21
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,4 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1489 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
110 HPPower117 HP
137 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size205/45 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4175 mmLength3800 mm
1665 mmWidth1580 mm
1480 mmHeight1150 mm
1010 KgWeight650 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Protege and 1996 Caterham 21 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…