2003 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.3 i (85 Hp) 2003Overall Score52.5/100
2003 Mazda Protege vs 2003 Ford Fusion Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 1.6 TDCi (90 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Ford Fusion
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord Fusion
MazdaMakeFord
ProtegeModelFusion
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord Fusion
—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1323 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
85 HPPower90 HP
110 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord Fusion
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord Fusion
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size195/60 R15
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord Fusion
4315 mmLength4020 mm
1695 mmWidth1708 mm
1410 mmHeight1503 mm
1020 KgWeight1105 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2488 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda Protege and 2003 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…