DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Premacy vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Premacy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
PremacyModelScenic
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
220 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption7 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4295 mmLength—
1705 mmWidth—
1600 mmHeight—
1340 KgWeight1365 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Premacy and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Premacy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…