DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Premacy vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
PremacyModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h15,2 s
170 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
220 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank59 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4380 mm
1705 mmWidth1805 mm
1600 mmHeight1760 mm
1340 KgWeight1405 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Premacy and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…